Reasons to Hire a Car Accident Attorney

If you’ve been involved in an unfortunate auto accident, you know how challenging the situation can be. From a personal standpoint, you’re likely dealing with the emotional toll of injury or pain. Couple this with the potential to lose a significant amount of money in medical and living expenses while you’re off work. What’s more is you’re probably spending most of your time and energy tending to your injuries and recuperating from your accident.

When you’re not injured, you’re likely dealing with long-term care, medical appointments, physical therapy, and insurance paperwork.

In cases such as these, it’s best to have a car accident lawyers at Owen on your side. Hiring a car accident attorney will protect your legal rights and give you the best chances of obtaining recovery. A car accident attorney can handle all the work required to pursue damages for any injuries you’ve obtained and provide you with peace of mind, knowing you’re not dealing with it alone. Here’s a look at some of the different ways of hiring a car accident attorney or how Patterson & Owen accident lawyers can help you:

1. Dealing with Insurance Companies in the Right Way:

Car accident claims can be a complicated ordeal. The insurance company will churn and turn in attempts to reduce your injury claim and/or pay you as little as possible. A car accident attorney knows all the ins and outs of a car accident claim and can navigate the treacherous waters of insurance companies in order to give you the best chances of recovery. A good attorney will be well versed in the many tactics insurance companies use to protect their bottom line and reduce the payout. But with expert assistance on your side, your chances of getting the payout you rightfully deserve are much better.

2. Help Prove Liability:

If you need assistance in proving the at-fault party was indeed at fault, a car accident attorney can help. Whether you need evidence to prove that it wasn’t your fault or you need to demonstrate the other party’s liability, the attorney will handle this difficult legwork for you. A good car accident attorney will thoroughly investigate the situation and present the evidence to substantiate or invalidate liability. In some cases, there will be multiple parties that will be at fault for your accident, so hiring an attorney will help you divide liability, thus necessitating less money from your pocket.

3. Can Assist in Increasing the Value of Your Claim:

Auto accidents are complicated. The liability of your car accident claim can be determined by many reasons. Your injury claim can often be determined by the injuries you’ve suffered, the length of recovery, and the amount of medical treatments received. A car accident attorney knows how to evaluate your case to determine the most appropriate value. This can often lead to a settlement that is more than you would’ve gotten had you not hired an attorney. In many cases, the amount of care you receive is important and can often result in a larger claim, thus entitling you to a larger settlement. With an attorney, you can avoid the pitfalls of accepting less than you deserve. In fact, with the help of an attorney, you can easily come away with a settlement that is twice as much as you would have received without them.

4. Help Alleviate Your Anxiety:

Being involved in a car accident can make you feel anxious and unsure. You’re in a vulnerable position, having to deal with potential injury and loss. Having an attorney will help you take a load off your mind and frees you up to focus on healing. Knowing that you’re receiving the proper treatment for your injury and that you have a reliable, professional working for you will help you heal with less stress and worry.

Call Owen, Patterson & Owen Today!

Hiring a car accident lawyer is a smart choice. They can help manage the many things that you won’t have time for—dealing with the insurance company and helping you establish fault. They can also help you get the full compensation you deserve for any injuries you’ve received.

Give us a call today to set an appointment with a car accident attorney who can help you fight for the maximum recovery for your case.

Law and Justice

Justice, in its broadest feeling, is the concept that individuals obtain that which they deserve, with the analysis of what then comprises “deserving” being impacted upon by countless areas, with several differing perspectives and also perspectives, including the principles of moral correctness based on ethics, rationality, law, religion, equity and also fairness.

Subsequently, the application of justice varies in every culture. Early theories of justice were set out by the Old Greek philosophers Plato in his work The Republic, as well as Aristotle in his Nicomachean Values. Throughout background numerous concepts have actually been developed. Supporters of divine command concept have actually claimed that justice issues from God. In the 1600s, philosophers such as John Locke stated that justice derives from natural law. Social agreement theory claimed that justice is stemmed from the common contract of every person. In the 1800s, practical theorists such as John Stuart Mill said that justice is based upon the very best results for the greatest number of people. Theories of distributive justice research what is to be distributed, in between whom they are to be dispersed, and also what is the proper circulation. Egalitarians have claimed that justice can just exist within the coordinates of equal rights. John Rawls used a social contract theory to claim that justice, and also especially distributive justice, is a form of justness. Robert Nozick and also others said that building civil liberties, also within the realm of distributive justice as well as natural law, makes the most of the general wide range of an economic system. Theories of retributive justice state that wrongdoing ought to be punished to insure justice. The carefully related corrective justice (additionally often called “reparative justice”) is a strategy to justice that concentrates on the demands of victims and also transgressors.
In his dialogue Republic, Plato makes use of Socrates to argue for justice that covers both the just person and also the simply City State. Justice is an appropriate, harmonious connection between the warring parts of the person or city. Therefore, Plato’s interpretation of justice is that justice is the having as well as doing of what is one’s very own. A just guy is a man in just the appropriate place, doing his ideal and also giving the precise equivalent of what he has gotten. This applies both at the private degree and at the universal degree. An individual’s spirit has three parts– reason, spirit and also desire. In a similar way, a city has 3 components– Socrates makes use of the parable of the chariot to highlight his point: a chariot works overall because the two equines’ power is guided by the charioteer. Fans of wisdom– theorists, in one feeling of the term– should rule because only they recognize what is great. If one is ill, one goes to a paramedic instead of a farmer, since the medic is expert in the subject of health. In a similar way, one should rely on one’s city to an expert in the subject of the great, not to a plain politician that tries to acquire power by providing people what they want, rather than what’s good for them. Socrates uses the parable of the ship to highlight this point: the unjustified city resembles a ship in open ocean, crewed by an effective yet drunken captain (the common people), a group of undependable consultants who attempt to control the captain right into giving them power over the ship’s training course (the political leaders), as well as a navigator (the thinker) who is the just one who knows how to obtain the ship to port. For Socrates, the only way the ship will reach its location– the great– is if the navigator takes charge.

Morality Justice

Interpretations of legislation often increase the question of the level to which regulation integrates morality. John Austin’s utilitarian solution was that regulation is “commands, backed by hazard of permissions, from a sovereign, to whom individuals have a habit of obedience”. Natural lawyers on the other side, such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, suggest that law mirrors basically moral as well as stable legislations of nature. The concept of “natural law” emerged in old Greek philosophy simultaneously as well as in connection with the idea of justice, and also returned to the mainstream of Western society through the works of Thomas Aquinas, especially his Treatise on Law.

Hugo Grotius, the creator of a purely rationalistic system of natural law, suggested that legislation emerges from both a social impulse– as Aristotle had actually indicated– and also factor. Immanuel Kant thought an ethical imperative calls for legislations “be selected as though they should hold as universal laws of nature”. Jeremy Bentham and his trainee Austin, complying with David Hume, believed that this conflated the “is” and also what “should certainly be” issue. Bentham as well as Austin argued for law’s positivism; that actual legislation is completely different from “principles”. [45] Kant was additionally criticised by Friedrich Nietzsche, that declined the concept of equality, and also thought that legislation emanates from the will to power, and can not be labeled as “moral” or “unethical”.

In 1934, the Austrian philosopher Hans Kelsen proceeded the positivist practice in his book the Pure Theory of Law. [49] Kelsen believed that although legislation is different from principles, it is endowed with “normativity”, indicating we should certainly obey it. While regulations declare “is” statements (e.g. the fine for reversing on a highway is EUR500); regulation informs us what we “need to” do. Hence, each lawful system can be hypothesised to have a basic standard (Grundnorm) instructing us to obey. Kelsen’s significant opponent, Carl Schmitt, rejected both positivism as well as the idea of the guideline of law due to the fact that he did not accept the primacy of abstract normative concepts over concrete political positions and decisions. [50] Consequently, Schmitt supported a jurisprudence of the exemption (state of emergency situation), which rejected that lawful norms can incorporate every one of the political experience.

Bentham’s utilitarian concepts stayed leading in law till the 20th century.
Later on in the 20th century, H. L. A. Hart struck Austin for his simplifications and also Kelsen for his fictions in The Principle of Legislation. Hart suggested regulation is a system of guidelines, separated into key (rules of conduct) and also additional ones (policies resolved to authorities to administer key guidelines). Secondary guidelines are additional divided into rules of adjudication (to settle lawful disagreements), policies of adjustment (allowing regulations to be varied) as well as the guideline of acknowledgment (allowing regulations to be determined as valid). Two of Hart’s trainees proceeded the dispute: In his book Law’s Realm, Ronald Dworkin assaulted Hart and the positivists for their refusal to treat regulation as an ethical problem. Dworkin argues that regulation is an “interpretive concept”, that requires judges to discover the best suitable and most simply solution to a lawful disagreement, offered their constitutional practices. Joseph Raz, on the other hand, defended the positivist overview and also criticised Hart’s “soft social thesis” technique in The Authority of Law. Raz suggests that law is authority, identifiable purely via social resources as well as without reference to ethical reasoning. In his view, any type of categorisation of policies beyond their function as reliable tools in arbitration are best delegated sociology, as opposed to jurisprudence.

History
Key write-up: Legal history

King Hammurabi is disclosed the code of legislations by the Mesopotamian sunlight god Shamash, also prized as the god of justice.
The background of regulation web links very closely to the development of people. Old Egyptian law, dating as far back as 3000 BC, was based upon the concept of Ma’at and also qualified by practice, ornate speech, social equality and impartiality.By the 22nd century BC, the ancient Sumerian ruler Ur-Nammu had actually formulated the very first law code, which included casuistic statements (“if … after that …”). Around 1760 BC, King Hammurabi additionally developed Babylonian regulation, by ordering and also inscribing it in rock. Hammurabi put several copies of his legislation code throughout the kingdom of Babylon as stelae, for the entire public to see; this became referred to as the Codex Hammurabi. One of the most undamaged duplicate of these stelae was found in the 19th century by British Assyriologists, and has actually since been fully translated and also converted right into numerous languages, consisting of English, Italian, German, and French.

The Old Testimony goes back to 1280 BC as well as takes the form of moral imperatives as referrals for a good society. The tiny Greek city-state, ancient Athens, from regarding the 8th century BC was the very first culture to be based on wide incorporation of its population, leaving out ladies and also the slave class. However, Athens had no legal scientific research or single word for “law”, depending rather on the three-way distinction in between divine legislation (thémis), human mandate (nomos) and custom-made (díkē). Yet Old Greek regulation consisted of major constitutional advancements in the advancement of democracy.

Roman law was heavily affected by Greek philosophy, yet its comprehensive policies were created by specialist jurists and also were highly sophisticated. [61] [62] Over the centuries in between the increase and decline of the Roman Empire, regulation was adapted to cope with the changing social situations and underwent significant codification under Theodosius II and also Justinian I. [63] Although codes were replaced by personalized as well as case law throughout the Early Middle Ages, Roman law was uncovered around the 11th century when middle ages legal scholars started to research study Roman codes and adjust their concepts to the canon law, bring to life the jus commune. Latin lawful mottos (called brocards) were assembled for support. In middle ages England, royal courts developed a body of precedent which later came to be the common law. A Europe-wide Law Merchant was developed to make sure that vendors could patronize usual criteria of technique instead of with the many splintered elements of neighborhood laws. The Regulation Seller, a forerunner to modern-day commercial legislation, stressed the freedom to contract and alienability of property.As nationalism grew in the 18th and 19th centuries, the Legislation Seller was included right into countries’ neighborhood regulation under new civil codes. The Napoleonic as well as German Codes ended up being one of the most prominent. In contrast to English common law, which consists of huge tomes of case law, codes in little publications are simple to export as well as easy for courts to apply. Nevertheless, today there are indications that civil as well as common law are converging.EU legislation is codified in treaties, but develops with de facto precedent set by the European Court of Justice.

law and Society

A recent symposium of the Law and also Courts E-newsletter (Winter 2007) included summaries of the regulation and also society area and also its connection to government, written by 7 (p. 293) political scientists that have long been energetic in this field. Viewers need to consult this problem for superb summaries of this huge and durable field. I will certainly focus on 3 wide areas of law and also society scholarship: disputing; decision-making; and also lawful belief and also consciousness. I will certainly after that quickly point out various other locations, while recognizing that I am still omitting numerous others.

1 Contesting
Research studies of challenging ask just how conflicts come to be court cases and what strikes cases once they remain in court. What are the alternatives to courts for settling problems or disagreements? Why do some problems become legal cases but the majority of do not? Just how does understanding challenging assistance to clarify dispute resolution and the effect of legislation? Both criminal as well as civil disputes in the U.S. fill out a pyramid with substantial varieties of grievances or injuries near the bottom, a smaller sized number that come to be disagreements, even fewer that contain some type of informal choice to regulation (calling the authorities or an attorney), an even smaller sized number with two-party legal task (appeal negotiating or negotiated negotiation), and only a little fraction settled by test (Trubek 1980– 1; Felstiner, Abel, and Sarat 1980– 1). A large study performed in the late 1970s by the Civil Lawsuits Study Project (CLRP) showed that different types of civil grievances (e.g. post-divorce) were likelier than others (e.g. discrimination) to reach higher on the pyramid of lawsuit (Miller and also Sarat 1980– 1; Kritzer 1991). The empirical outcomes of the CLRP scholars have been reported in myriad judicial process textbooks however this crucial, forty-year-old study has actually not been replicated.

Galanter’s (1974) comprehensive concept exploring using courts by repeat gamers vs. one-shotters recommended multiple methods which those experienced in lawful procedures are advantaged in the legal process. Galanter also demonstrated how disparities in the legal profession (field of expertise, relationships with customers, legal training, etc.) additionally exacerbated the advantages of the repeat players. Galanter’s research in the Legislation and Culture Review is among one of the most frequently mentioned legislation review articles of perpetuity. A variety of empirical researches ever since have sustained his concept (see Kritzer and Silbey 2003).

One element of Galanter’s concept centers on the differential use formal vs. informal systems for conflict settlement by repeat gamers and also one-shotters. That is, parties who are extra familiar with legal processes know when to settle out of court as well as when to press on to official test, according to the probability of gain in the lawful guideline as opposed to a win or loss in the prompt problem. This disagreement, incredibly sustained by Albiston’s (1999) research on lawsuits results after the Family and Medical Leave Act, shows an important link in between disputing and change in the law. Employers that were taken legal action against by workers seeking household leave ultimately “won” even when they “lost” by settling some cases out of court since companies acquired important rule-making chances in other instances that inevitably compromised the legislation.

An additional method which disputing can be connected to alter in regulation is with the growth or reframing of a dispute into a brand-new normative framework, and also via the assistance for that development that parties might obtain. As Mather as well as Yngvesson (1980– 1) recommend, lawful situations are not unbiased events, but are socially created to mirror the interests of fans of disputants, to interest a specific target market, as well as to include the values and language of regulation. The language of law is naturally political, buying truths and also invoking standards to support one set of rate of interests or an additional. By building insurance claims in certain methods, one can increase the law and activate others on behalf of the brand-new analysis. Groups doing not have in political power might do well in bring in support for lawful modification through reframing problems and also setting in motion assistance, as received litigation over similar worth (McCann 1994), tobacco control (Mather 1998), as well as unwanted sexual advances (Marshall 2005). A triumph in litigation, even if later on turned around on charm, can assist in agenda setup and function as a driver for further change.

The affiliation among lawsuits, political order, and political adjustment additionally emerges in empirical research study on making use of courts gradually. Filing conflicts in court must be viewed as an option to typical kinds of political involvement, as Zemans (1983) said, and undoubtedly longitudinal study of court use in the UNITED STATE by McIntosh (1983) sustains this sight. Nevertheless, courts are not passive establishments waiting for disputes to percolate up the pyramid to end up being straw for judicial choices. Courts are organizations of the state and also therefore, they (or other arms of government) can and also do exercise power to shape the nature as well as quantity of lawsuits (Munger 1990; Harrington and also Ward 1995). This general point concerning the power of organizations was made in regulation and society research study time back. Recent battles over tort reform show it well, as actions by state legislatures, Congress, as well as the UNITED STATE Supreme Court have actually all sought to curb what service rate of interests viewed as an “surge” of litigation.